Photo Credit: EcoFlight
Ray Mine Expansion – Privatization of public lands
Ray Mine Expansion
ASARCO LLC’s Ray Mine in Pinal County, Arizona, has an alarming track record of environmental damage: it once spilled 20 tons of sulfuric acid onto the central Arizona landscape, and the water quality in the stream receiving its waste is so poor that the Department of Environmental Quality recommends humans stay out of it. That doesn’t bother ASARCO, which wants to expand the mine—or the Bureau of Land Management, which is pursuing a land trade to make it happen.
Ray Mine Expansion Location
Ray Mine Expansion
The owner of the Ray Mine has an abominable track record of environmental damage, but the Bureau of Land Management is nevertheless proposing a land trade with it.
Public Lands Explained
Find out what public lands are, who manages them, and what their designations mean from Guardians’ Public Lands Guardian.
Photo: U.S. Forest Service
Ray Mine Expansion – The Details
The Ray Mine’s history of environmental damage includes disfiguring the central Arizona landscape and spilling PCBs and 20 tons of sulfuric acid. Monitoring wells near the mine have recorded elevated levels of metals, total dissolved solids, sulfates, and nitrates in groundwater. Mineral Creek, a 17-mile stream that receives the mine’s wastewater, suffers from elevated levels of copper, zinc, turbidity and pH. The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality has determined that Mineral Creek is too polluted for swimming and bathing, livestock watering, and wildlife.
For decades, Ray Mine’s owner, ASARCO LLC, has sought to expand the mine and extend its life. In 2000, the multinational corporation reached an agreement with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to acquire approximately 8,200 acres of public lands and 2,800 acres of federally owned minerals via a land exchange (in return, BLM would receive about 7,300 acres of ASARCO land elsewhere in Arizona.) Owning the land used for the mine expansion would allow ASARCO to operate primarily under Arizona’s environmental and mining laws rather than stricter federal law. A lighter regulatory regime would enable ASARCO to invest less capital in environmental safeguards and remediation, resulting in greater profits and more environmental damage.
While common sense dictates that a lighter regulatory regime will result in greater environmental impacts, BLM, tasked with analyzing the land trade’s impacts, reached a different conclusion. It concluded that ASARCO would operate the Ray Mine the same way regardless of whether BLM made the trade or not. Conservationists challenged BLM’s illogical determination and a federal appeals court ultimately agreed, stopping the land trade in 2010 and chastising the agency for ignoring the additional environmental impacts that could be expected.
Now—more than 20 years after it was first proposed—BLM has once again done ASARCO’s bidding and re-committed to the Ray Mine trade. In October, 2019, BLM issued its decision to proceed with the Ray Land Exchange with ASARCO. Opponents of the exchange have 45 days to file an administrative protest. Litigation, if necessary would not begin until all protests are resolved by Interior.
Astonishingly, BLM has once again concluded ASARCO would operate its mine the same way whether or not the land trade took place. The agency ignored the 2010 court decision and neglected to alter its analysis in any substantial way. Conservationists are digging in, ready to once again take BLM to court if the Department of the Interior denies the protests.
ASARCO’s persistent interest in this land exchange is unsurprising. Mining companies often pursue land exchanges as the preferred means of expanding operations. Operating on private land, rather than public, minimizes federal oversight. In addition to state law being more lenient than federal law, state regulators are generally thought to be more responsive to the requests and concerns of mining companies than their federal counterparts.
Don’t Miss Out on Public Lands News!
You’re informed about the most dastardly privatization schemes—now, ensure you stay that way! Join Guardians’ email list and we’ll keep you apprised of what’s going on in the world of public lands.
Public Lands Privatization Schemes
Learn more about the public lands at risk across the United States.
Dairy Syncline Mine
Village at Wolf Creek
Resolution Copper Mine
Ray Mine Expansion
Las Vegas Sprawl
OMYA Mining Public Land Sale
Emery County Public Land Management Act
ONSHORE Act and Federal Land Freedom Act
King Cove Land Exchange
National Monument Reductions
How You Can Help
Help protect the magnificent wild places of the West! Be a guardian for public lands by joining the conversation, learning about current issues, and making your voice heard. Together, we’re a powerful force for nature.
Recent Stories From Public Lands
Nine reasons to save the Joshua tree
Learn what sets the iconic Joshua tree apart—and what you can do to save it
America the Beautiful for all
A national coalition articulating a vision for change
Public Lands Press
Department of Interior moves to protect mature and old-growth trees and forests from logging
Wide-ranging rule will include Bureau of Land Management forest policiesRead more >
We can promote resilience in Santa Fe mountain forests
The Sangre de Cristo Mountains rise in beauty behind Santa Fe. They are home for species ranging from rare giant helleborine orchids to the tiny threatened American pikas, along with our state’s iconic bald eagles, mule deer, cougars and black bears.Read more >
Groups ask court to stop U.S. Forest Service from building Yaak logging roads
Conservation groups this week asked Missoula federal district court to prevent the Kootenai National Forest from building logging roads on the west side of the Yaak region starting in mid-May.Read more >
We want to stay in touch with you
Receive regular updates from WildEarth Guardians in your inbox.
"*" indicates required fields