Izembek lagoon. Photo Credit: USFWS
King Cove Land Exchange – Privatization of public lands
King Cove Land Exchange
Lies paved the way for King Cove Native Corporation’s proposed 12-mile road through the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. First, the Corporation insisted that it needed the road to haul fresh fish to an airport for distribution. When that didn’t work, it changed its tune, claiming the road is necessary for emergency medical services (despite an Interior analysis finding it would be impassable during winter storms). One truth is clear, however: a road would be disastrous to Izembek, which is a critical stop on the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds.
King Cove Land Exchange Location
King Cove Land Exchange
A privatization scheme in Alaska would build an unnecessary 12-mile-long road through a national wildlife refuge.
Photo Credit: U.S. Forest Service
King Cove Land Exchange- The Details
On January 22, 2018, then-Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke signed an agreement to exchange a 12-mile strip of public land in the Izembek National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) on the Alaska Peninsula. In exchange for the refuge parcel, the proponent, King Cove Native Corporation, would trade the U.S. an equally-valued amount of its own land. The trade would enable the Native corporation to build a road from the village of King Cove to a regional airport at Cold Bay, about 20 miles away. The road would cross a wilderness area inside the refuge, destroying unique habitat that supports more than 200 species of wildlife. Izembek NWR is a critical stop on the Pacific Flyway for migratory birds, with endangered Steller’s Eider and nearly all the world’s Emperor Geese and Pacific Black Brant dependent on the refuge’s eelgrass lagoons.
King Cove now claims this road is the only safe way to get residents in need of medical evacuation to the Cold Bay airport during inclement weather. However, a 2012 Interior analysis found not only that alternate means of evacuation were safe and feasible, but also that a road through the refuge would often be impassable during winter storms. Then-Interior Secretary Sally Jewell rejected King Cove’s land exchange proposal in 2013 after determining the benefits of acquiring additional land for the National Wildlife Refuge system would not compensate for the proposed road’s impact on Izembek’s unique habitat.
King Cove was not deterred by Jewell’s decision. It has been biding its time for decades, waiting for a favorable opportunity—since 1994 there have been at least eight legislative attempts to push this exchange through. The Trump administration’s general disdain for public lands and environmental concerns offered another opportunity. Zinke, despite his predecessor’s recognition of the ecological importance of the area, revived the proposal soon after he was confirmed. Internal documents show Interior sought to keep reconsideration of the exchange shielded from public view, and that the idea and push to reexamine the trade came straight from Zinke’s office. He eventually approved the trade without taking public comment or conducting any new environmental analysis.
The history of the King Cove exchange illustrates that ostensible public benefits can be used to conceal true motivations behind privatization deals. When the road was first proposed, there was no claimed need for safe medical evacuations during winter storms. Rather, King Cove’s 1994 resolution stated the road would provide a link from the local salmon processor to the Cold Bay airport. In 1995, then-Governor Tony Knowles reiterated the road was needed to transport fresh salmon from King Cove to the airport. Representative Don Young’s (R-AK) 1997 bill placed no restrictions on use of the road. It wasn’t until later, after it became clear that commerce alone could not justify a road across a remote and ecologically rich Alaska wildlife refuge, that public health and safety became the overriding need.
Although recent King Cove exchange bills strictly limited the road to noncommercial uses only, the exchange agreement signed by Secretary Zinke does not. And although the agreement purports to prohibit the commercial transport of fish on the new road, its exception for individuals and small businesses could effectively nullify the provision, according to an analysis by the Center for Investigative Reporting.
On March 29, 2019, the federal district court in Alaska rejected the proposed trade, finding that Zinke and Interior violated the law when it reversed Jewell’s decision without any explanation. As of publication the government had not said whether it will appeal the ruling. For now, Izembek’s irreplaceable habitat is protected from the devastation, but if the ruling stands expect Alaska’s Congressional delegation to once again introduce legislation mandating the land trade.
Don’t Miss Out on Public Lands News!
You’re informed about the most dastardly privatization schemes—now, ensure you stay that way! Join Guardians’ email list and we’ll keep you apprised of what’s going on in the world of public lands.
Public Lands Privatization Schemes
Learn more about the public lands at risk across the United States.
How You Can Help
Help protect the magnificent wild places of the West! Be a guardian for public lands by joining the conversation, learning about current issues, and making your voice heard. Together, we're a powerful force for nature.
Recent Stories From Public Lands
Lands contain habitat for greater sage grouse, redband trout
This piece originally appeared in the Santa Fe New Mexican on June 15, 2019
Keeping livestock off public lands has many benefits, but existing law doesn’t allow for permanent livestock grazing permit retirement
Public Lands Press
For centuries, Chaco Canyon was a gathering place where ancestral Puebloan peoples came together to make their world a better place. At the heart of the ancient civilization’s genius are the complex and intricate relationships between its grand architecture, global commerce, ceremonies and their link to solar and lunar cycles.Read more >
A new scientific study indicates that under “business-as-usual” scenarios that fail to address climate change, Joshua trees will almost completely disappear from their namesake park by 2099. In September of 2015, Guardians submitted a scientific petition to the Service asking the agency to list the Joshua tree as “threatened.”Read more >