WildEarth Guardians

A Force for Nature

Select Page
Adriel Heisey

Preserving the imperiled Rio Grande and its ecosystem

WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Army COE
Status
Lost, district court decision issued on August 14, 2018, appellate court decision issued on January 17, 2020
Case No.
1:14-cv-00666 (district court), 18-2153 (appellate court)
Date Filed
July 24, 2014
State, Venue
New Mexico, New Mexico Federal District Court
Lawyers
Samantha Ruscavage-Barz, Steve Sugarman
Program
Rivers
On July 24, 2014, WildEarth Guardians filed suit against the Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for failing to implement changes regarding the management of the Rio Grande, which has been detrimental to this Great River and its animal and human inhabitants. The case, WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Army COE, was brought in New Mexico Federal District Court by Guardians staff attorney Samantha Ruscavage-Barz and Steve Sugarman in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Guardians argues that the lack of oversight by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers not only is in direct violation of the Endangered Species Act, but also has disrupted the river’s historic flow patterns. Disruption of the river has negatively impacted the greater Middle Rio Grande ecosystem, including the many communities along the river’s path that rely on it for agriculture, tourism, and recreation. Because the Rio Grande’s long path—its 1,900 miles make it the third-longest river in the continental United States—is sustained primarily by snowmelt in the mountains of Colorado and New Mexico, the river’s flows are highly variable and have been drastically altered by dam construction and water diversion for agriculture.

Water flow from reservoirs along the river is largely regulated by the Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Because of their failure to modify the river’s flow to benefit endangered species, the survival of many federally protected species, including the Rio Grande silvery minnow, the Southwestern willow flycatcher, and the yellow-billed cuckoo, is in jeopardy. Due to the drastic changes to the river’s course and flow, the Rio Grande silvery minnow, once abundant in the Rio Grande and Pecos rivers, is now only found in a 174-mile stretch of the Rio Grande. Similarly, the Southwestern willow flycatcher and yellow-billed cuckoo, which rely on rich riparian willow groves for breeding and successful reproduction, have declined drastically as river habitats have diminished. Since the original filing Guardians has narrowed our case to focus exclusively on the Corps of Engineers, which is arguing, incredibly, that its dams and reservoir operations, including primarily Cochiti Reservoir on the main stream of the Rio Grande, are not subject to the Endangered Species Act. In this case, Guardians is seeking a decision that will require the Corps of Engineers to exercise its discretion to manage its reservoirs, especially Cochiti, in a way that mimics historic river flow patterns that will create better aquatic and cottonwood/willow habitats. These changes would not only benefit the river’s endangered species, but also ensure the continued use and enjoyment of the river by current and future generations. Courts sided with the Corps of Engineers in finding that the agency lacked discretion to modify its dam operations to benefit the survival and recovery of listed species that rely on a healthy river ecosystem.